The Courtroom Psychologist:

A Blog

Archives

De Facto Expert vs. Objective Evaluating Expert: The Role of Forensic Psychologists in Court
Kathryn Ambeau, Ph.D. Kathryn Ambeau, Ph.D.

De Facto Expert vs. Objective Evaluating Expert: The Role of Forensic Psychologists in Court

In legal cases, it is crucial to distinguish between treatment providers and forensic psychologists when seeking expert testimony. Treatment providers, such as therapists, have a subjective, supportive relationship with their patients, which can skew their opinions when testifying on psychological matters outside the scope of their treatment. In contrast, forensic psychologists are objective evaluators who conduct comprehensive assessments, using data from tests, records, and collateral interviews. Their training allows them to provide neutral, evidence-based opinions in court, making them better suited for expert testimony. Attorneys must recognize this difference to ensure unbiased, reliable testimony in legal proceedings.

Read More